From 7670c56ebe004e698551635f9c5d48a1794066dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Stone <ahs3@ahs3.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:52:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Correct DSDT Address field in FACP tables

The FADT allows either the DSDT Address or XDSDT Address field to be
zero.  However, the table definition used by the table compiler still
requires the DSDT Address to be non-zero, which is not correct.  So,
remove the DT_NON_ZERO flag from the field.

Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
---
 source/common/dmtbinfo.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/source/common/dmtbinfo.c b/source/common/dmtbinfo.c
index 2e1c54f84..07d3ce099 100644
--- a/source/common/dmtbinfo.c
+++ b/source/common/dmtbinfo.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ ACPI_DMTABLE_INFO           AcpiDmTableInfoFacs[] =
 ACPI_DMTABLE_INFO           AcpiDmTableInfoFadt1[] =
 {
     {ACPI_DMT_UINT32,   ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Facs),                    "FACS Address", 0},
-    {ACPI_DMT_UINT32,   ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Dsdt),                    "DSDT Address", DT_NON_ZERO},
+    {ACPI_DMT_UINT32,   ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Dsdt),                    "DSDT Address", 0},
     {ACPI_DMT_UINT8,    ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (Model),                   "Model", 0},
     {ACPI_DMT_FADTPM,   ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (PreferredProfile),        "PM Profile", 0},
     {ACPI_DMT_UINT16,   ACPI_FADT_OFFSET (SciInterrupt),            "SCI Interrupt", 0},
-- 
2.20.1

