From 0526d27e9eddd9c2a54434cf0dcdb136a6c659e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 15:22:47 +1200
Subject: [PATCH 05/99] CVE-2022-32746 s4/dsdb/acl: Fix LDB flags comparison

LDB_FLAG_MOD_* values are not actually flags, and the previous
comparison was equivalent to

(el->flags & LDB_FLAG_MOD_MASK) == 0

which is only true if none of the LDB_FLAG_MOD_* values are set, so we
would not successfully return if the element was a DELETE. Correct the
expression to what it was intended to be.

BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009

Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
---
 source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c | 5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
index 21e83276bfd..8016a2d4bd0 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
@@ -734,8 +734,9 @@ static int acl_check_spn(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 		 * If not add or replace (eg delete),
 		 * return success
 		 */
-		if ((el->flags
-		     & (LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD|LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE)) == 0) {
+		if (LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(el->flags) != LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD &&
+		    LDB_FLAG_MOD_TYPE(el->flags) != LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE)
+		{
 			talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
 			return LDB_SUCCESS;
 		}
-- 
2.25.1
